Ryzen 7 1700X

CPU, AMD d.  11. maj. 2017, skrevet af KleitusIV 7 Kommentarer.  Vist: 7125 gange.

AMD har sendt os et brev, hvor de gerne vil gøre opmærksom på Ryzen 7 1700X og dens gode ydelse i forhold til Intel's i7-7700K. De har også lavet en grafisk oversigt over styrkeforholdet, og der er naturligvis fokus på rå ydelse i beregningstunge applikationer. Uden at lyve ved de godt at i7-7700K yder bedre i 1080p gaming, men vil selvfølgelig også gøre opmærksom på, at denne forskel minimeres, når vi sætter opløsningen op til 4K. De store forskelle skal derimod findes i andre applikationer hvor Ryzen 7 virkelig trækker fra.

 

Ryzen 7 1700X: The balance of power has shifted

The launch of AMD's brand new Ryzen 7 CPUs in March has brought competition back to the desktop CPU market. Featuring 8 cores and 16 threads, Ryzen 7 is AMD's latest high-end CPU engineered for gamers, content creators and professional users.

Attached is a chart showcasing Ryzen 7 1700X performance compared to Intel's i7-7700K in popular PC usage scenarios including: 4K AAA-gaming, game streaming, content creation, and video encoding.

Highlighted statistics:

  • Compared to the Ryzen 7 1700X, the Core i7-7700K achieved 67% the video encoding performance in Handbrake and 82% the performance in Adobe Premiere CC
  • In simultaneous game streaming via OBS, the Ryzen 7 1700X dropped less than 1% of frames, while the Core i7-7700K dropped 18% of frames
  • Compared to the Ryzen 7 1700X, the Core i7-7700K achieved 65% the performance in POVRay, 69% the performance in Blender, and 63% the performance in Cinebench, for an average content creation performance of 66% relative to the Ryzen 7 1700X

From brainstorms to breakthroughs and visionaries to victories, the incredibly powerful AMD Ryzen processor empowers you to game, design and create without boundaries.

 

© 2017, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., All rights reserved. AMD, and the AMD Arrow logo, Ryzen and combinations thereof, are trademarks of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
*Testing by AMD Performance labs as of March 3, 2017 on the following systems: Socket AM4: Ryzen™ 7 1700 processor, with NVIDIA GTX 1070 6 GB graphics adapter 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 RAM, Windows 10 RS2operating system, Graphics driver 21.21.13.7633 :: 12/11/2016;, and Socket 1151: Z270 SLI, Core i7-7700K processor, with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB graphics adapter, 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-2400 RAM, Windows 10 RS2operating system, Graphics driver 21.21.13.7633 :: 12/11/2016. Compared to the Ryzen 7 1700X, the Core i7-7700K achieved 67% the video encoding performance in Handbrake and 82% the performance in Adobe Premiere CC, for an average video encoding performance of 75% relative to the Ryzen 7 1700X. Compared to the Ryzen 7 1700X, the Core i7-7700K achieved 65% the performance in POVRay, 69% the performance in Blender, and 63% the performance in Cinebench, for an average content creation performance of 66% relative to the Ryzen 7 1700X. In simultaneous game streaming via OBS, the Ryzen 7 1700X dropped less than 1% of frames, while the Core i7-7700K dropped 18% of frames. In VR performance, both the Ryzen 7 1700X and Core i7-7700K dropped less than 1% of frames in the Price of Freedom, Serious Sam, and Raw Data game benchmark tests. RZN-31
** This information represents the views of third parties at http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-ryzen-5-review/, http://www.game-debate.com/news/22699/amd-ryzen-5-1500x-and-ryzen-5-1600x-v-intel-i5-kaby-lake-gaming-performance-benchmarks, http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/luke-hill/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-cpu-review/10/, https://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/luke-hill/amd-ryzen-5-1600x-6c12t-cpu-review/10/ for secure data encryption, 1080p gaming and Premium Gaming, respectively. These third party results have not been verified by AMD. AMD has no obligation to update third party information and will under no circumstances be for any damages resulting from your reliance on this third party content.

Hr.
 
Elitebruger
Tilføjet:
12-05-2017 11:07:59
Svar/Indlæg:
1363/125
Meget fedt. :D


Sven
 
Superbruger
Tilføjet:
12-05-2017 16:28:23
Svar/Indlæg:
3635/81
dem er lidtmis vissende i det lange loeb.
ikke fordi det er direkte forkert.
men at vise 4k omradde som er staerkt dominered af GPU'en viser ikke hvordan CPU er i forhold til Intels CPU. men blot er begge er gode nok lige nu og her.

som spiller komerm til at kraeve mere og der kommer hurtiger oghurtiger GPU'en saa vil forskellen i det omradde komem til at see mere og mere ud som under 1080P.

Bare lige saa folk har det i bagtanken


Shadowhunter
 
Elitebruger
Tilføjet:
14-05-2017 09:52:23
Svar/Indlæg:
5474/39
#2
Færreste der har 4k endnu. Fleste kør 1440p med høj hz. Derfor er grafen lidt irrelevant.

4k @ høj hz er lidt ude i fremtiden endnu. Da grafikkort ikke rigtigt kan trække den over 60 fps.


Svaret blev redigeret 1 gang, sidst af Shadowhunter d. 14-05-2017 09:53:34.


Tera
 
Elitebruger
Tilføjet:
16-05-2017 17:46:38
Svar/Indlæg:
17/0
#2 Når de beskriver grafikken tror jeg nærmere det handler om det integrerede grafik og ikke så meget om du afvikler det med en separat gpu.


gandalf18
 
Ny Skribent
Tilføjet:
16-05-2017 18:38:11
Svar/Indlæg:
5330/456
4# ryzen har ikke intregreret grafik :)


Tera
 
Elitebruger
Tilføjet:
16-05-2017 19:15:07
Svar/Indlæg:
17/0
Når ja hade jeg lige glemt et øjeblik selvom jeg selv sider med en. :P haha


gandalf18
 
Ny Skribent
Tilføjet:
16-05-2017 20:46:57
Svar/Indlæg:
5330/456
6# hehe , og hvilken onboard grafik vil du køre 4k på ? , hehe