Nyhed: 2. gen. AMD Ryzen ™ PRO og AMD Athlon ™ PRO-mobilprocessorer til nye premium- og entrylevel Notebooks

CPU, AMD d.  15. april. 2019, skrevet af Burgurne
2 Kommentarer.  Vist: 1338 gange.

 

Pressemeddelse:

- De nye AMD Ryzen PRO og AMD Athlon PRO CPU'er i  kommercielle notebookbøger fra HP og Lenovo giver de effektive ydeevne, sikkerhedsniveauer på siliconiveau og batterilevetid for at få forretningsbrugere igennem arbejdsdagen  [i]-

SANTA CLARA, Californien - 8. april 2019 - I dag annoncerede AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) de seneste tilføjelser til sin PRO-processor lineup: 2. Gen AMD Ryzen PRO mobile processorer med Radeon ™ Vega Graphics og AMD Athlon ™ PRO mobile processorer med Radeon Vega Graphics. Tilbydes kommercielle brugere af notebook-computere med effektive ydeevne, avancerede sikkerhedsfunktioner og pålidelighed og håndterbarhed i kommerciel kvalitet, de nye processorer gør det muligt for globale pc-producenter at oprette en bred vifte af forretningssystemer, fra premium professionelle notebooks til hverdagen produktivitetsnotebooks. De første kommercielle systemer fra HP og Lenovo forventes i 2.kvartal med andre OEM'er og yderligere platform opdateringer forventes senere i 2019.

"Moderne pc-brugere forventer, at erfaringerne mellem professionelle og personlige notebooks er umærkelige, og brugere af bærbare computere ønsker at udnytte de nyeste moderne funktioner, herunder 3D-modellering, videoredigering, multi-display opsætninger, samt multitasking sikkert for at blive mere produktive," sagde Saeid Moshkelani , Senior Vice President og General Manager, Client Compute, AMD. "Med AMD Ryzen PRO og Athlon PRO mobile processorer leverer AMD den rigtige ydeevne, funktioner og valg til OEM'er og kommercielle brugere kombineret med produktiviteten, beskyttelsen og de professionelle funktioner, der er nødvendige for at sikre en problemfri implementering i en organisation."

2. generations Ryzen PRO mobile processorer:

De nye AMD Ryzen ™ PRO 3000-seriens mobilprocessorer leverer den bedste teknologi i fremtiden [ii] og øger produktiviteten ved at tilbyde op til 16% mere multi-threading processor ydeevne end konkurrence [iii].

Specielt leverer de nye AMD Ryzen PRO mobile processorer:

o op til 12 timers generel kontorbrug eller op til 10 timers videoafspilning 

o op til 14% hurtigere indholdsoprettelse [iv] og fremskyndede dagligdags kontorapplikationer med integreret Radeon Vega-grafik, fra 3D-modellering til videoredigering,

o kraftfulde sikkerhedsfunktioner på alle Ryzen PRO processorer med AMDs sikkerhed co-processor indbygget i silicium,

o og 18 måneders billedstabilitet, 24 måneders tilgængelighed for processorer, kommerciel kvalitetskvalitet, virksomhedsklasses håndterbarhed og 36 måneders begrænset garanti til systemproducenter.

AMD tilbyder også "Zen" -baserede [v] Athlon PRO mobile processorer, der giver et større udvalg af mobile computing oplevelser over hele budgetspektret.

 

Partner Citater

"HP er forpligtet til at hæve linjen for kraftfulde og sikre kommercielle enheder med banebrydende pc-innovationer," siger Andy Rhodes, Global Head Commercial Personal Systems, HP Inc. "HP er stolt over at tilbyde den bredeste AMD-portefølje i branchen med ypperste resultater, sikkerhed og pålidelighed til erhvervslivet overalt. "

"Da integrationen af arbejdsliv integreres, og folk søger øget fleksibilitet i deres livsstil, har de brug for tilgængelige værktøjer til at forblive produktive og underholdende når som helst og hvor som helst," siger Jerry Paradise, vicepræsident, Lenovo Commercial Product Portfolio. "Lenovo er glad for at samarbejde med AMD for at tilbyde kommercielle brugere mobile oplevelser, der balancerer ydeevne og bærbarhed til at drive den moderne arbejdsstyrke og er spændte på at udvide partnerskabet til vores nyeste premium ThinkPad-seriens notebooks snart."

 

 

 

 

[i] Testing by AMD performance labs as of 12/4/2018. “Battery life” defined as hours of continuous usage before the system automatically shuts down due to depleted battery. Video playback tested according to Microsoft WER methodology, while “general usage” is tested via MobileMark 14. Results presented in minutes, in order of: 1st Gen AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700U Mobile Processor (100%) vs. 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen™ 7 3700U Mobile Processor. General Usage: Ryzen™ 7 2700U: 8.1 hours vs. Ryzen™ 7 3700U: 12.3 hours (51% longer). Video Playback: Ryzen™ 7 2700U: 6.9 hours vs. Ryzen™ 7 3700U: 10 hours (40% longer). Ryzen™ 7 2700U Test System: Lenovo IdeaPad 530s, Ryzen™ 7 2700U, 2x4GB DDR4-2400, Radeon™ Vega10 Graphics (driver 23.20.768.0), 1920x1080 AUO 403D 13.9” panel, 512GB Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G SSD, 45Whr battery, 150 nits brightness, Windows® 10 x64 RS4. Ryzen™ 7 3700U Test System: AMD Reference Motherboard, AMD Ryzen™ 7 3700U, 2x4GB DDR4-2400, Radeon™ Vega10 Graphics (driver 23.20.768.0), AUO B140HAN05.4 14” panel, 256GB WD Black WD256G1XOC SSD, 50Whr battery, 150 nits brightness, Windows® 10 x64 RS5. Results may vary with drivers and configuration. RVM-164

[ii] "Processor for ultrathin notebooks" defined as 15W typical TDP. "Class" for "best-in-class" defined as an ultrathin notebook <20mm Z-height. Testing conducted by AMD performance labs as of 12/02/2018. Cinebench R15 nT ("CPU"): Core i5-8250U vs. Ryzen™ 5 3500U: 524 vs. 651 (24%/1.24X faster for AMD); Core i7-8565U vs. Ryzen™ 7 3700U: 619 vs. 688 (11%/1.11X faster for AMD). 3DMark® Time Spy ("GPU"): Core i5-8250U vs. Ryzen™ 5 3500U: 399 vs. 907 (127%/2.27X faster for AMD); Core i7-8565U vs. Ryzen™ 7 3700U: 444 vs. 967 (118%/2.18X faster for AMD). 50:50 Average of GPU and CPU: Core i5-8250U vs. Ryzen™ 5 3500U: (0.5×1.24+0.5×2.27) = 1.75X faster for AMD; Core i7-8565U vs. Ryzen™ 7 3700U: (0.5×1.11+0.5×2.18) = 1.645X faster for AMD. Core i7-8565U Test System: Dell Inspiron 7586, 2x4GB DDR4-2400, Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Intel Graphics HD 620 (driver 24.20.100.6287), Windows® 10 Pro x64 (build 1803). Core i5-8250U Test System: HP Spectre 13t, 2x4GB LPDDR4-2133, Samsung 850 EVO SSD, Intel Graphics HD 620 (driver 24.20.100.6287), Windows® 10 Pro x64 (build 1803). AMD Ryzen™ Test System: AMD Reference Motherboard, 2x4GB DDR4-2400, Radeon™ Vega 10 Graphics (driver 18.41-181105a), Windows® 10 Pro x64 (build 1803). Results may vary with configuration and drivers. RVM-155

[iii] Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of January 10, 2019 | Cinebench nT used to measure CPU Multi Thread Performance. Performance presented in i7-7600U | (HP EliteBook 840 G4) (100%) vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scored a 688.4775, i7-8650U | (HP EliteBook 840r G4) scored a 593.24 while the i7-7600U (HP EliteBook 840 G4) scored a 349.885 for a comparison of 688.4775/349.885=1.97 and 593.24/349.885=1.70 respectively. PCMark 10 used to measure System Performance. Performance presented in i7-7600U | (HP EliteBook 840 G4) (100%) vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scored a 4075.5, i7-8650U | (HP EliteBook 840r G4) scored a 4063.75 while the i7-7600U (HP EliteBook 840 G4) scored a 3688 for a comparison of 4075.5/3688=1.11 and 4063.75/3688=1.10 respectively. 3DMark 11 Performance used to measure Graphics Performance. Performance presented in i7-7600U | (HP EliteBook 840 G4) (100%) vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scored a 4432.25, i7-8650U | (HP EliteBook 840r G4) scored a 2153 while the i7-7600U (HP EliteBook 840 G4) scored a 1919 for a comparison of 4432.25/1919=2.31 and 2153/1919=1.12 respectively. System Configurations: AMD Ryzen™ 7 PRO 3700U, 2x4GB DDR4, Radeon™ Vega 10 Graphics (driver 25.20.14102.16), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, Windows® 10 Pro x64 | Intel i7-8650U, 2x4GB DDR4, Intel UHD 620 Graphics (driver 23.20.16.4973), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, Windows® 10 Pro x64 | Intel i7-7600U, 2x4GB DDR4, Intel HD 620 Graphics (driver 23.20.16.5018), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, Windows® 10 Pro x64 | PCMark and 3DMark are registered trademarks of Futuremark Corporation. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. All scores in are an average of 3 runs with the same settings.  Performance may vary based on use of latest drivers. PP-8

[iv] Testing conducted by AMD Performance Labs as of January 10, 2019 “Photo Editing defined as a scripted series of photo filters in Photoshop presented in i7-8650U (Dell Latitude 7490) (100%) vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U took 52.9 seconds to complete, while the i7-8650U took 71.9 seconds for a comparison of (71.9-52.9)/52.9=1.36 | SPECView Perf 13 3DSMax used to measure 3D Modeling Performance. Performance presented in i7-8650U (Dell Latitude 7490) (100%) vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scored a 24.265 while the i7-8650U scored a 14.7525 for a comparison of 24.265/14.7525=1.64 | SPECView Perf 13 Medical used to measure Medical Viewset Performance. Performance presented in i7-8650U (Dell Latitude 7490) (100%) vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scored a 7.84 while the i7-8650U scored a 2.19 for a comparison of 7.84/2.1875=3.58 | PCMark 10 DCC Subtest used to measure Content Creation Performance. Performance presented in i7-8650U (Dell Latitude 7490) (100%) vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U scored a 3595.25 while the i7-8650U scored a 3162 for a comparison of 3595.25/3162=1.14 | System Configurations: AMD Ryzen™ 7 PRO 3700U, 2x4GB DDR4, Radeon™ Vega 10 Graphics (driver 25.20.14102.16), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, Windows® 10 Pro x64 | Intel i7-8650U, Dell Latitude 7490, 2x4GB DDR4, Intel UHD 620 Graphics (driver  22.20.16.4799), Samsung 850 Pro SSD, Windows® 10 Pro x64 PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. All scores in are an average of 3 runs with the same settings.  Performance may vary based on use of latest drivers. PP-10

[v] The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and is subject to change without notice. Timelines, roadmaps, and/or product release dates shown herein are plans only and subject to change. “Zen” is codename for AMD architecture, and is not a product name. GD-122

 

MichaelH
 
Overclocker
Tilføjet:
14-04-2019 09:40:20
Svar/Indlæg:
144/0

Det er altså skarpt, at I ikke fjerner kontaktoplysninger fra de personer, der sender jer pressemeddelelserne...



IgIbUu
 
Elitebruger
Tilføjet:
15-04-2019 23:10:53
Svar/Indlæg:
608/59

Gode nyheder !